设正点财经为首页     加入收藏
首 页 财经新闻 主力数据 财经视频 研究报告 证券软件 内参传闻 股市学院 指标公式
你的位置: > 正点财经 > 研究报告 > 正文

Chinese banks:Liquidity Risk Management Guideline

类型:行业研究  机构:德意志银行   研究员:Hans Fan,Jacky Zuo  日期:2017-12-08
http://www.zdcj.net      点击收藏此报告
    

Wholesale-funded banks with high shadow banking exposure under pressure.

    The CBRC released today The Guideline on Liquidity Risks of CommercialBanks, matching the Basel III standards of liquidity management (e.g. LCR andNSFR) and introducing new measures. We view it as a continuation of financialdeleveraging, as we expect this regulation to lower banks’ duration mismatch,cut off wholesale funding and reduce investment in shadow banking assets. Assuch we see a net positive over the longer run as it reduces systemic liquidityrisks. However, near term, the banks that are wholesale-funded and shadowbanking-centric are likely subject to NIM pressure. Among the banks we cover,joint-stock banks are more affected while big banks should benefit.

    What prompted regulators to issue such a regulation.

    The leverage in China’s financial sector has increased notably in past years,characterized by rising duration mismatch and proliferation of shadow banking.

    Liquidity risks in the system trended up accordingly and only recently havestarted to moderate given the ongoing financial deleveraging campaign. Tofurther contain liquidity risks, it is necessary to strengthen banks’ liquiditymanagement, especially for joint-stock banks and smaller city/rural banks.

    What are the regulatory changes.

    The key change is that the regulators introduced three liquidity risk indicators:1) Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR), which measures banks’ ability to supportmedium-to-long-term funding needs; 2) Liquidity Matching Ratio (LMR), whichmeasures the degree of duration mismatch; and 3) High Quality Liquid Asset(HQLA) Adequacy Ratio, which is a simplified version of Liquidity CoverageRatio (LCR) and is applied to banks with assets below Rmb200bn. Togetherwith LCR and Liquidity Ratio introduced in the past, the CBRC has establisheda comprehensive liquidity risk monitoring system (Fig 3).

    What are the implications for the entire financial system.

    Judging by the details, China’s regulators are inclined to suppress interbankbusinesses with speculative purposes and to contain banks’ shadow bankingexposure, while encouraging traditional loans/bond investments and thedevelopment of retail and SME banking. For example, the NSFR calculationassumes a much higher stability rate of 90-95% for retail deposits than 0-50%for corporate and interbank deposits. Also, for LMR the discounting rate forinterbank deposits less than 3 months was only 0%, vs. 70% for deposits. Thisregulation is a follow-up to The Asset Management Guideline issued on 17 Nov2017 (see our report), suggesting that the financial deleveraging campaign isnot over yet. We expect China’s shadow banking to shrink with risingtransparency while the growth of loan and bond market should stay resilient.

    What are the implications for individual banks.

    We believe the regulation should favor banks with stronger deposit franchises,higher CASA ratio, less duration mismatch and better asset quality. Indeed, ourdetailed calculation (Fig 4) shows that deposit-funded banks i.e. big-four banks,are delivering higher LCR, LMR and Liquidity Ratio than other banks. Amongthe banks we cover, CMB, CNCB and MSB were reporting LCR lower thanregulatory requirement, and many JSBs were showing lower LMR. We expectthese banks to be subject to NIM pressure in the near run, as they may beforced to switch to lower-yield assets and/or to lengthen liability duration.

璧炲姪鍟嗛摼鎺�
   
  • 如果不能阅读报告,请点击下载阅读器
关于我们 | 商务合作 | 联系投稿 | 联系删稿 | 合作伙伴 | 法律声明 | 网站地图
濮濓絿鍋g純鎴e偍缂侊拷婢圭増妲戦敂鐗堝鏉炲€熺カ鐠侇垯绮庢禒锝堛€冩担婊嗏偓鍛嚋娴滈缚顫囬悙骞库偓鍌欑瑝娣囨繆鐦夌拠銉や繆閹垽绱欓崠鍛娴e棔绗夐梽鎰艾閺傚洤鐡ч妴浣规殶閹诡喖寮烽崶鍓у閿涘鍙忛柈銊﹀灗閼板懘鍎撮崚鍡楀敶鐎瑰湱娈戦崙鍡欌€橀幀褋鈧胶婀$€圭偞鈧佲偓浣哥暚閺佸瓨鈧佲偓浣稿挤閺冭埖鈧佲偓浣稿斧閸掓稒鈧呯搼閿涘矁瀚㈤張澶夐暅閺夊喛绱濈拠椋庮儑娑撯偓閺冨爼妫块崨濠勭叀閸掔娀娅庨妴鍌氬敶鐎归€涚矌娓氭稒濮囩挧鍕偓鍛棘閼板喛绱濋獮鏈电瑝閺嬪嫭鍨氶幎鏇$カ瀵ら缚顔呴敍灞惧鐠у嫯鈧懏宓佸銈嗘惙娴f粣绱濇搴ㄦ珦閼奉亝濯撮妴锟�